House finally passes bill
extending jobless benefits
>
Archive
-
Daily Online
Author: John Wojcik
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 06/16/08 14:33
The Democratic controlled House passed a bill June 12 extending unemployment benefits from 26 weeks to 39 weeks in most states and to 52 weeks in states with official unemployment rates of 6 percent or more.
49 Republicans joined Democrats to give the bill a 274-137 vote majority. All 137 opponents were Republicans.
Opponents said unemployment rates were not high enough to justify the extension while proponents of the measure pointed out that the rate of increase in joblessness in May was the largest increase in 22 years.
The deliberations that resulted in passage of the bill followed a two-day lobbying effort by many of the nation’s unions that involved millions of e-mails and phone calls to members of Congress. It also followed a June 11 vote on a special, no-debate measure put forward by Democratic leaders that would have veto-proofed the bill. The measure fell just three votes short of the 282 votes it needed for passage.
The extended benefits passed by the House on June 12 are also included in the Iraq war funding bill. President Bush, however, has already vowed to veto any war funding bill that has anything in it other than funds for the war.
Arguing for passage of the bill during a press conference June 10, AFL-CIO Legislative Director Bill Samuel said, “The economy is in free fall and working people are struggling. The share of all the unemployed who are jobless more than six months is 18 percent, and there are two jobless workers searching per every job available.”
The bill, which is expected to be killed by a Bush veto, would have made the extension in benefits available to workers who exhausted their benefits as far back as last November. Each month this year, according to Samuels, 200,000 additional workers have used up their benefits by reaching the end of their 26th week.
Posting guidelines: User posts and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments, such as anti-working class, sexist, racist, anti-Semitic, anti-Communist, homophobic or other offensive material will be removed from the site. In addition, discussion threads that appear to be confined to two people, do not add to the discussion and/or are repetitive may also be deleted. Further, entries that are not verified by e-mail will not be posted in order to prevent spam postings (e.g. comments that contain links to unrelated web sites). Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site.
blog comments powered by Disqus